Areas and Current Issues in PFM Practice
Three buckets of PFM topics
Three current issues shaping PFM practice
What's changing in how PFM is approached
- 1
What counts as "good" practice
Emphasis has shifted from chasing a single global "best practice" toward pursuing what is "good," or even "good enough," for a given country's circumstances — focusing on what is reasonable and practical.
- 2
Country context
Political-economy and contextual factors matter a great deal. Informal rules of behaviour are often more influential in practice than formal legal rules, especially in developing and emerging economies.
- 3
Pace and sequencing of reform
Financial-management institutions cannot be swapped out overnight the way software can be upgraded. Reforms need careful prioritisation — generally addressing basics (macro-fiscal management, accounting, cash management, internal control) before attempting more advanced reforms — and should start from a diagnosis of the actual problem, not a pre-packaged 'solution.'
A reform programme wants to introduce advanced performance budgeting in a country whose basic cash management and accounting systems are still unreliable. What does the 'pace and sequencing' principle suggest?
Good sequencing means addressing basics — macro-fiscal management, accounting, cash management, internal control — before attempting more advanced reforms like performance budgeting. Skipping ahead onto weak foundations tends to fail.
Key takeaways
- PFM topics fall into core, specialized, and other buckets — which areas get attention shifts over time.
- Thinking has moved from chasing one global "best practice" toward what is good enough for a country's own context.
- Informal behavioural rules often matter more in practice than formal legal ones, especially in developing/emerging economies.
- Reforms must be sequenced — basics before advanced tools — starting from an actual diagnosis, not a pre-packaged solution.
- The strength of core central finance agencies largely determines whether any reform actually succeeds.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between core and specialized PFM topics?
Core topics are the foundational building blocks every PFM system needs — budgeting, execution, accounting, audit, transparency. Specialized topics go deeper into specific areas like fiscal rules, fiscal risk, or aid management, often building on a solid core.
Why has 'best practice' fallen out of favour as a goal?
Because a single global 'best practice' often doesn't fit a country's actual legal tradition, administrative capacity, or political-economy context. 'Good enough for this country' is now seen as a more realistic and effective target.
Why can't PFM reforms be implemented all at once?
Because institutions change gradually, unlike software. Trying to implement advanced reforms before basic systems (cash management, accounting, internal control) are solid tends to fail — sequencing has to match actual capacity.
Enjoying this? Get the next lesson by email.
Occasional, practical notes on public finance. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.